In this article I will describe how the transition from First to Second Tier – and more specifically from the Green level to Yellow/Teal – is taking place in individuals, organisations and in society. They are no longer motivated by their own interests or only one perspective, but are able to see what is functional for the survival and even flourishing of humanity as a whole. These leaders are integral thinkers and actors. If the transition succeeds, we will see people, organizations and societies take the lead based on human-oriented openness and a clear transcending view with a capacity to integrate differences into innovative solutions. to realize the Sustainable Development Goals) cannot be implemented because we need the integrated benefits of all previous value systems to find requisite solutions for today’s complex problems. Available solutions to actual and future problems (e.g. If this transition from the Green postmodern to the Yellow integral perspective stagnates, the risk of chaos and regression is huge. According to the theory of evolution (like Spiral Dynamics integral), the next step is the transition to integral thinking, integral acting and integral (personal and collective) leadership. Now what? Postmodernity has fulfilled her role in the development of the social welfare state, the increasing attention for sustainability, communication, personal growth and solidarity with others. Because a clear vision and focused choices are lacking, many people fall into confusion and are looking for strong (Red) leaders.
In the extreme, in Green nothing is more true and more of value than anything else. Ken Wilber explains1 that Green Postmodernity got stuck and didn’t pick up its role as the next ‘Leading Edge’, because of its excessive view of subjectivity, in which all is linked to context and truth doesn’t exist. Typical contributors include political scientists and political behaviorists biosecurity and international-security experts life scientists, clinicians, health-policy scholars, and bioethicists moral and evolutionary philosophers environmental scientists and ecological economists political-behavioral and environmental historians science-policy scholars and historians of science and legal scholars.The evolutionary process seems to have fallen into regression (example: the election of Trump).
The PLS topic range is exceptionally broad: evolutionary and laboratory insights into political behavior, including political violence, from group conflict to war, terrorism, and torture political analysis of life-sciences research, health policy, environmental policy, and biosecurity policy and philosophical analysis of life-sciences problems, such as bioethical controversies. PLS is owned and published by the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, the APLS, which is both an American Political Science Association (APSA) Related Group and an American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS) Member Society. Politics and the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal with a global audience.
0 kommentar(er)
